You know what's great about writing a blog on the internet?
Nobody gives a flying fuck, really, what I think. I just want to vote to feel loved. And I think I'm smarter than most of you.
Here is a response to an email from my Senator. This is like, performance art.
---
Japhy Bartlett to Senator
Hey, THANK YOU, for including me on an obviously automated mailing list, with your generic statement about Iran.
See, I cared so much about this, that I wrote you twice - and you were kind enough to REPLY to me twice. With the same standard statement.
Now Debbie, I'm OK with a newsletter. I would actually be pretty cool with you guys emailing me whatever press releases you give out. And I'll go a step further -
I run some websites for southwest michigan businesses, and I have a handy dandy, homemade newsletter mailing robot - which is smart enough to weed duplicate email addresses out of a mailing.
So EMAIL GUY:
c'mon dude, this is sloppy. but seriously, I'm on your side I think.
OK, now SPEECHWRITER GUY:
I think this letter sucks - and I'm going to point out why.
On 11/26/07, Senator Debbie Stabenow wrote:
>
>
>
> November 26, 2007
>
>
>
>
>
> Mr. Japhy Bartlett
>
> 651 Territorial Road
>
> Benton Harbor, MI 49022
>
>
>
There was a shit ton of whitespace up there. It's not going on a
piece of paper, man.
>
>
> Thank you . . .
>
>
>
> . . for contacting me about your opposition to the Administration's policy
> on Iran. I appreciate you sharing your views with me on this important
> issue.
>
I think that part was pretty classy, actually.
>
>
> As you know, the Bush Administration has made critical comments regarding
> Iran's actions during the conflict in Iraq, as well as about the developing
> Iranian nuclear program.
ohkaayyy. Can we adopt a stronger stance, please, than 'has made _critical_ comments'?
I mean I guess 'hostile' is too antagonistic, but we are being dangerously subtle here. I don't know, sarcasm is hard to convey in
text.
> I agree with you that we should be working to
> establish peace and stability in the Middle East. Our relationship with Iran
> will likely be a continuing subject of debate in the Senate. I assure you
> that I will keep your strong views in mind as this situation develops.
>
I would kind of like to know, what Debbie Stabenow's actual stance on this situation is. Are we stalling to reveal our view for some tactical gain? I mean, maybe.. but I honestly think, right now, most people care more about their politicians taking firm, honest stances, that they can explain in a few sentences.
And there are some yes/nos that we kind of need:
Are you OK with torture?
Are you OK with our military trespassing on a sovereign nation? And by that I mean, in a legalese fashion, (btw, feel free to steal this stuff) is any country that we're not already in.
Give us that, at LEAST. There are so many people crying for this war to end, and we're still seriously not saying that we won't EXPAND it. There are still seriously people saying we should expand it. We have fucking lunatics in office?
Debbie, we are hurting bad back here in Michigan, and it's going to be a long cold winter.
Give us a position at least.
>
>
> Again, thank you for taking the time to contact me. Please feel free to do
> so in the future whenever I may be of help to you or your family.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Debbie Stabenow
>
> United States Senator
>
>
>
> DS:jm
>
and man, what the heck is DS:jm? this is the sort of kooky shit that feeds the paranoids. I mean, what the hell is that? Did someone just type gibberish at the bottom of the letter? Whatever vaguely reasonable answer I can come up with, I can immediately counter with a very harsh criticism, so maybe I will just shut the hell up.
Love,
Japhy